Copyright © 2012-2018 DE-filmFilme, Clips - kostenlos ansehen, online teilen
El Cid Gallery
Funny...the British Royals knew all along Diana would never wear any crown..they used her as a brood mare then killed her...
I laugh at this stuff!
Top ten priceless items stolen from india by british http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoOURIdTT3g
The Royal Family should start by returning all the Jewels, Diamonds and precious stones to their rightful owners, mostly plundered from the colonies and especially from India. And the Kohinoor Diamond is a vivid symbol of the plundering and stealing done in the name of the British Monarchy. There is nothing to be proud of these looted jewels in which you can see blood dripping from them. Top ten priceless items stolen from india by british http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoOURIdTT3g
2:57 That will grace Camilla’s head lol... The diamond called the “Lawhure diamond” is more fitting I think
Every Muslim male’s fight over that 💎. If you’re not surrounded by Muslim’s You’re fine...oh, wait. That’s right there s is England we’re talking about- -right. Better keep that where it is.
The Nader Shah the king of Persia brought two Dimond from India after he won the war. One Kohnoor that is in England on Queen crown. The other one Daryaynoor is in Persia in Museum.
The diamonds were not gifted from India but were looted from India.. So is our kohinoor n peacock thrown
*Bharti Kalsotra* You really have to stop making things up
big woop diamonds can't buy u love
Beautiful show, well done. As an American, i'm sorry that i just don't understand how people could accept having someone else claim a "right" to be over them, "by God and royal birthright". Why don't they ever ask why German people have the right to rule them? Or why their queen married a natzi? Funny how they don't talk about that or show the home movies of their queen, as a child, being taught how to throw the "Heil Hitler" salute. Just curious.
+John King The Queen married Prince Philip of Greece and Denmark who is of Danish, British and German ancestry. His sisters were married to genuine NAZIs and were excluded from the wedding in 1947 and the Coronation in 1953. Philip's mother, Princess Alice of Greece (formerly Battenburg) was born in England and was the brother of Earl Mountbatten of Burma came to live at Buckingham Palace.
The Queen never married a Nazi, Prince Philip of of Greek ancestry. Monarchy is now constitutional, in which the monarch reigns but has no executive power, all power rests with parliament and has done since the restoration of the monarchy in 1660.
+Christy Cridlebaugh Any improvements in the economy were a legacy of Obama's actions. The jobs stuff is just that, mere stuff. As I said, keep your Pumpist shit to yourself, the *ENTIRE* world laughs at the US now because of him and his supporters. You know *FUCK ALL* about the monarchy. Oh and as to Germans? Pump *IS* German, 3rd generation German. Get your facts sorted before you rattle your fingers on your keyboard.
+supernumery idk about any natzis in power here, but i have to say that our economy is getting stronger and we're getting more jobs too. And this IS the place to put my opinions, so keep your hate to yourself.
*Christy Cridlebaugh* The rest of the world can't understand why America has an elected (or in his case unelected) monarch with more or less limitless powers. The Queen has very few 'powers' as such, real power comes from parliament, ie., the people. As for your other shit, keep your stupid opinions to yourself because your country actual has a *REAL* NAZI in power.
A wonderful presentation incorporating the beauty, the meaning, the tradition and the majesty of the collection. I most specifically enjoyed hearing the histories attached. This was very well presented.
The Queen doesn't own any of the crowns or the State Diadem. Her personal jewellery is of course priceless but they were bought and paid for by her ancestors. Diana would NOT have worn the Queen Consort's Crown because a new Consort crown is always made for a new Queen Consort. Most of the jewels come from the previous crown including the Koh-I-Noor diamond.
Fascinating that how many people went after the stones
THEY SHOULD GIVE IT BACK TO INDIA
+JTrainer trainer Agreed
You should give your house back to the person who built it
Jan Delisle: India is not a person, it's a country. The country of India never owned jewels. Wealthy Indian people DID, and passed them on through, deals/treaties/romances/payoffs/bribes/gifts etc, to other wealthy people. The country of India has no right to these jewels, because the country of India never owned them. It's pretty arrogant of you to think that YOU know how jewels and riches were passed on between wealthy people hundreds (and thousands) of years ago.
Jan Delisle It didn't all come from India
BUT, they're all STOLEN.
Wonder how money they wanted for these docmentaries .monye grabbing the lot of them
All stolen from other countries ,how they can call it their own .Britain does not have gold,diamonds mines .
Neeta Shah: No - these jewels never belonged to "countries." They belonged to wealthy people who couldn't care less about the poor. And then they were passed on to other wealthy people, by way of payoffs, bribes, treaties, gifts, etc. hundreds (and thousands) of years ago, and now YOU think YOU know who the true owners are??? And where are these "peaceful countries" you speak of? The one's who have everything "taken from them??" Do you know how foolish you sound? By your logic, these jewels technically belong to the Earth, and therefore should be put back into the ground, because mother nature had them first. That's not how commerce, diplomacy, power and wealth between nations work in the real world. You've been brainwashed to think the way you do, so I don't hold it against you.
J true they will not feed the poor but they belong to the countries they belong to ,in a museum no doubt they do not belong to Britain The rich countries have taken everything from peaceful countries.
"Stolen"? You have no idea what deals/treaties/romances/payoffs/bribes/etc. were made between the filthy rich and their jewels behind closed doors hundreds of years ago, ....and anyone who SAYS they know is full of themselves. These kinds of jewels have always been passed around from the very rich to the even richer. But even IF the Brits were to "give them back" (a ridiculously ignorant notion) do you think it would go to the poor? NO! ...Can the poor eat them? NO! These jewels would be on the head/neck/finger of another wealthy person. Period.
Ruthless history ,these days we call them blood diamonds .our history full of stolen thing just have to visit v&a British museum to see that
Stolen not give we may have a gold mine but all the stones from the colonies,rubies emerarld ect .we have been stealing for a long tm .If we returned all the Jewel the crown would look bare
We are present due to a granted request for God, a created male Spirit, who has the greatest desire to be recognized as creator. Father, The Creator, granted the request for the impersonator to have a limited time of pretence with a high level of pain allotment. In The Worlds Plan, which is currently underway, God wanted individuals to be in positions of kings, queens etc while living on Earth. All positions are prearranged on Earth. Father is King of Creation and Mother is Queen of Creation the only true royalty for Eternity. Father has arranged for precious gems, gold, platinum that are currently used by others, will be used for precious jewelry for Himself and Mother in the future.
+Cheryl Centenio *FUCK OFF* *BLOCKED!!!!!!*
+supernumery What a nasty response! Father's Doctrine will replace the current doctrines, which are false, in the near future worldwide ultimately.
+Cheryl Centenio I'd fucking sign the papers to have you confined in asylum
+supernumery You did not accept and sign The Control Agreement, which would have allowed Father to control you to prevent sinning. You are one of many removed from Heaven long ago and placed on a planet below the Heaven region due to your status. Enjoy life while you can.
+Cheryl Centenio Wow! You are scary, do you actually believe any of that shit or are voices telling you to? Seek help, your mania can only get worse.
This is a fantastic documentary. I love it. Canada
Kohinoor Diamond belongs to India , Jahangir gave it to his beloved wife mumtaz , British military took the Diamond and other precious stone with gold from India
+Sigrid Haldirsson no it was stolen by the British East India Company. Who did hipocracy with the Indian subcontinental people. So we can say India should claim and making case.
Rehana Syeda: Even IF that were true (it isn't) - why should it be given back to India??? According to your misguided logic, it should go back to the "Beloved wife of Jahangir" (do you know how to find her?) And while we're "giving things back" - how about India "give back" the BILLIONS in financial aid the Brits have given to India. Then - how about India also find a way to pay back Britain for the massive humanitarian services (medical, disaster relief, food, etc.) they have provided over multiple decades.
It was obtained legally under the terms of the Last Treaty of Lahore.
Most of the Royal Jewels was looted from the ex-colonies like India and others.
+AnnaElisavetta Vonnedozza What do you mean by 'more than made up' ? Millions of people were killed by savage Britishers in India. How do you justify that. Present British citizens/economy is enjoying the loot done by their fore-fathers in colonies in India, Africa. Nothing can justify the cruelty done by the British in India. Watch this to educate yourself - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7CW7S0zxv4
*Khullar Singh* *MOST* were given as tributes or gifts from fabulously wealthy nabobs and Maharajahs.
AnnaElisavetta Vonnedozza And England has more than made up for it by giving countries like India billions in aid. Stop complaining
"Looted"? You have no idea what deals/treaties/romances/payoffs/bribes/etc. were made between the filthy rich and their jewels behind closed doors hundreds of years ago, ....and anyone who SAYS they know is full of themselves. These kinds of jewels have always been passed around from the very rich to the even richer. But even IF the Brits were to "give them back" (a ridiculously ignorant notion) do you think it would go to the poor? NO! ...Can the poor eat them? NO! These jewels would be on the head/neck/finger of another wealthy person - regardless of the country they reside. Period.
Susy menkes est UNE GROSSE TARTE RIDICULE, si c'est cette dame la critique mondiale de la MODE avec son horrible coiffure... Idem pour WINTOUR, qui regarde les défilés avec des lunettes de soleil...comment distinguer les détails et les coloris DU GRAND N'IMPORTE QUOI
I guess the queen is a nice person, but the royal family really are the most useless people in the world.
+Stephanie Jade Why don't you go back and hid under your bridge you TROLL
supernumery oh ok
+Stephanie Jade And you are an ignorant, presumably American imbecile.
+BeachBoysfan4ever MLP The Prime Minister is Head of Government but the Queen is Head of State. Both have limitations on their powers and the ultimate powers are exercised by the directly elected Parliament.
They do have a use, they are the Panda Bears of the West. Totally dependent on thousands of people for their daily existence while feeling totally self sufficient. They are all cute as hell and we can't help but watch them. And the Billions of Pounds the people who come to see them leave on that island benefits all.
JOB? LOL! Walking around shaking hands for a few minutes, flying on jets, taking exotic trips, wearing the best clothes and jewels and being waited on hand and foot is NOT A JOB! Why do the taxpaying WORKER BEES of GREAT BRITAIN keep putting up with all that RITUAL stuff?
*Shirley RB* Why do you put up with your evil *Emperor* who has almost limitless powers that are far beyond those of any European monarchy.
Why don't Americans stand up to Trump?
Because they are very stupid and don't understand they they are being taken foe a ride .
Why exactly are there queen's and king's. What good have they done for their people?.
The prime minister is the head of government and the Queen is head of state. They have limited power between them and parliament has to vote on their actions
Peoples fed the RF
Me 2 LOL
At about 48:00 a comment was made that the Queen only have Princess Diana a few items & Duchess of York none..that maybe she held back because of troublesome marriages from the start & waiting for them to be married longer like 10-25 years anniversary. Then why does The Duchess of Cornwall have so many? In my opinion one of the least deserving. At least if she had given Diana & Sarah the jewels they would of been passed down to The Queens grandchildren.... Kinda frustrating. I also think that if given jewels upon divorce, desperation or death...the family should be offered 1st dibbs before saleing them at auction...that's just my opinion.
+Kathy McCaul I know Sara Ferguson was made for her wedding day...she did not come from a family that has tiaras like Diana...so The Queen & Prince Phillip had one made for her...Diana's was from her Spencer family collection.
I have not watched the whole video yet but I believe that to be a wrong statement. I believe the queen gave her the tiara she wore on her wedding day. I actually believe it was specially commissioned just for her by the queen and prince Philip as a wedding present.
*Denise Wright* Clearly you know nothing about The Duchess of Cornwall apart from the garbage pouring forth from cheap tabloids. Diana had some of the Spencer jewels and some pieces Charles and the Queen bought her, these apart from the ones Diana sold have passed to her eldest son, Prince William. Fergie received loads of jewels from Andrew but as is usual for her, many of them were sold to fund her ridiculous lifestyle. You seem to be suggesting that camilla has amassed a vast collection of jewelry, she hasn't. Don't base your opinions on YouTube videos or tabloid crap.
Most of the jewels the Duchess of Cornwall wears are from the late Queen Mother who left some of her most valuable pieces such as the Boucheron Tiara to Prince Charles. As Camilla is now his wedded wife it is natural that he wants her to "look the part" and so she often wears these splendid jewels. I am glad however that she ceased to wear the Loversknot Tiara which had been given to Diana by the Queen on her Wedding day and taken back right after her death. It is much more befitting that the Duchess of Cornwall is wearing it and anyway, Camilla has enough jewelry that she does not need to create negative emotions by wearing pieces Princess Diana had in her possession while she was alive.
Potato camera, unwatchable for me. Bye.
when i visited London seeing the crown jewels was the highlight of my visit .Theyre truly magnificent.
Magnificently done. They are housed in the Tower of London, one can do the tour. well worth the effort.
blanche deveroux - all stolen... from Africa/India/Egypt/Australia etc.etc & put on display in Tower of London/various museums/Palaces/Castles!!
I had the privilege to see what are 'The' Crown Jewels at the Tower when I lived in England and they are truly magnificent. Have to say however, my heritage is of the Crown Jewels of Scotland (the Crown, Scepter and Sword called the Regalia) and my ancestors kept and cared for them until put on display in Edinburgh Castle and are very majestic too! That sword is as tall as I am!
*Ruth Hammons* The Scottish Crown Jewels are called, "The Honours of Scotland".The Jewels were kept hidden under the pulpit during the Cromwellian invasion by James Grainger, Church of Scotland Minister of Kineff Parish Church after they were smuggled out of nearby Dunottar Castle. When the monarchy was restored the jewels were taken to Edinburgh Castle and locked in a trunk. When George IV visited the castle with Sir Walter Scott in 1818, the trunk was opened and there they were, all dulled and sad looking. The Sword is some 3.25" in length so either you are a child or a midget if the sword is as tall as you are. Are you seriously telling us you are descended from James Grainger, Sir Walter Scott, The Duke of Hamilton or even King George IV?????
Ruth Hammons I had the privilege of viewing the Crown Jewels of Scotland, they are breathtaking! One vivid memory of the visit was when I was in line for the viewing. A large portrait of QEII was hanging on the wall, and someone had stuck a wad of chewing gum underneath the Queen’s nostril!! Wish my camera had been working..😂😂
Except they are not really "from England" now are they - ? lol
Why didn't I marry a man who could afford to give me jewelry like that?My problem is that I thought my ex husband was stinking rich when he was just stinking
you sound like a Gold Digger to me if that all you want a man for just to give you fancy and expensive jewelry
Fitzroi : Why says anything about Shannon if you can’t be polite! If you read this go to bed & ask for Forgiveness from God! I will God Bless you !
lovelove ex - sooo basically you're saying you don't believe your teachers?!!
Sabb luut luut k apna khajana bhara hai ..dakku bolenge to chalenga..
Shame the vid quality is not better on this.
Beautiful but just stones nonetheless. We give stones more importance then life itself.
I wish I had just one of the Queen's jewelry
Shockingly inaccurate. Surely someone must have checked the script,but obviously not.
pity about the poor quality of this video
Im not trying to be rude but I don’t get it🤔As an American, I can NOT understand why the British people allow a monarchy. They’re not needed to run the government so...why not kick them out & save the country a few billion pounds every year? 🤷♀️ I just don’t get it.
The monarchy has to go. It's power over others. We are all equal. £300 million worth of rock's is excessive .
*Stephanie Kelly* I simply cannot understand why you Americans have a certifiable, mendacious lunatic as your *KING* If the British people want a monarchy, it's up to them, not some ill-informed moron from a dysfunctional hell hole.
I’m American &ain’t understand completely. Their value for their country’s history & identity are just 2 reasons, as well as what they mean as a constitutional head of state. Some also do charity work, work in business, & serve their country in terms of military service. You can’t honestly say our politicians or bullion $ wall st CEO’s are better
I'm an American, and well aware of the benefits of British Royalty. It wouldn't work in most countries, but it's wonderfully unique to Britain and is one of their most endearing institutions. There are many haters (even in Britain) but many don't understand the amount of money this family generates through tourism alone - not to mention the fact that it is a unifying force for the nation's morale, strength and identity. There is no country on Earth who's character is so clearly identifiable and consistent. No other Monarchy has captured the imagination of the world quite the same as the Brits. Yes, they (The Royals) are just people - but this Monarchy - with it's enduring history, continuity, and tradition of bygone days, should be a source of great pride to every British subject. From the other side of the pond I say, "God save the Queen!"
The monarchy is part of our national DNA that we've inherited from our ancestors - that's the truth. It's not about money, or tourism or even the day-to-day functioning of government. It's almost a mystical thing that lies at the heart of our inner self confidence. That's a thing that's especially true of the English. Not claiming any of this is especially healthy, but ask anyone what they really feel &, if you try hard enough, you'll probably get the same answer.
When the Queen dies, who inherits her jewels?
Neeta Shah the Crown Jewels and all the heritage paintings and such are held in trust for the monarch (which is what I think you mean by belonging to the country). However, some of these items (tiaras and brooches) are actually owned privately by the royal family. All of the biggest, most expensive jewels (Stars of Africa, etc.) are not privately owned. 😉
They Don't belong to the royal family ,they belong to the country ,all the Jewel,painting ect
Dope Chick generally they are left to the next in line to the throne. However, I believe some items may be left to particular individuals. Maybe a tiara or two or a few of the brooches. Most of the jewels are worn by women, so it would make sense to leave them to women.
Whoever comes next.
Ms. Suzy Menkes' prejudice against the Irish is on as much of a flamboyant display as any jewel in the royal crowns..... shame on her.
*bullirish* She is rather fond of Ireland and the Irish because she knows Britain and Ireland are the same peoples with a common history. Queen Victoria loved Dublin and spent many holidays there in the Áras an Uachtaráin, then known as Viceregal Lodge. You can blame successive politicians for the ill-treatment of Ireland, not the people
The Irish dance jigs
All stole from poorer countries. they should all be given back to whatever country they originally came from. thieving bastards
+markmh835 The Americans took the then British Parliamentary system and have kept it to this day virtually unchanged. The UK had the great reform bills of the 19th Century and every so often the statute based constitution is reviewed.It is the best system and as you say, the countries that use it are amongst the most stable and prosperous in the world.
+Ann Alejandro There is *NO* England. The country is called, "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland or UK for short. Typical American bollox.
England makes up for it in what they give those poorer countries in aid.
Frankie Boyle: These kinds of jewels have always been passed around from the very rich to the even richer. But even IF the Brits were to "give them back" (a ridiculously ignorant notion) do you think it would go to the poor? NO! ...Can the poor eat them? NO! These jewels would be on the head/neck/finger of another wealthy person. Period. You have no idea what deals/treaties/romances/payoffs/bribes/etc. were made between the filthy rich and their jewels behind closed doors hundreds of years ago, ....and anyone who SAYS they know is full of themselves.
*Ann Alejandro* You are an ignorant idiot.
I always wanted to wear a real Tiara crown, wonder how it would look and feel on my head! lol Oh to be Queen! LOL
Glad i am not.
Oops...Thanks for the correction and information...Edit!
Tiara, my sweetheart. Tiara. Terraria are places where one keeps frogs and lizards etc. or just Plants.
They speak about it in the Bible they wear many Crowns, and are Kings of Kings and Lord of Lords, they claim to be God on Earth, and people still believe in the Fake News in the Bible.
greedy thieves stole all this jewllery from india africa and many other states poor russians lost all their jewels by that thieving mary all of it should be reptratied when i saw them at the tower of london i was infuriated.
Russian s lost their jewels due to being killed by the communists
You shouldn't get sucked into these tours. You are throwing away money just to get FURIOUS. How infuriating !
i cannot believe i am awe struck over these jewels..i did not know i was that kind of girl..lol great documentary.
Dear Ms Menkes. We need to talk about your hair.... :-/
+Hrh-Pan F lmao
@Inca Moran 😂😂😂 you made me laugh so... I'm sure Suzy Menkes has a few of the "royal jewels" stuffed into dat hair bun of hers!! 😂 😂 😂
Looks Like Ms. Menkes is the Author of "The Royal Jewels". And yes, the "do" makes one sit up and notice. Perhaps she is trying to make a "crown" of her own?
You can’t eat the jewels? sell them and feed the starving would be a better legacy.
Sell them to who? Somebody, somewhere will still own them.
Hat a greedy one not to return the jewels to historical owners. No wonder she won’t wear them in the countries owners😂
*Simone Barbou* *NAME THESE "OWNERS"*
Please learn history! The government in Russia murdered the Granddaughter of Queen Victoria, and most of the jewels were confiscated from the murdered royals. Many of the jewels that were smuggled out of Russia were purchased by the family of the murdered royals. They are family. The very government who killed them is the government to whom you would give these family jewels.
HELLO MY BEAUTIFUL QUEEN ELIZABETH GEORGE ' ILOVE SO MUCH DIAMOND ROYALE FAMILY ' OH ....PLEASE ' THIS BEAUTIFUL DIAMOND BETTER GIVE MY SWEETY PRINCES CHARLOTTE ELIZABETH DIANA OK ???? AND PRINCE GEORGE 👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑🙏🙏💖💖👍🏽👍🏽🏛🏛🏛🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧👍🏽 YES AND BETTER GIVE YOU KATE AND MARKLE BUT SORRY FIR CAMILLA VERY TABU !!!!!
Fuck sake. What a ramble !
bunch of lazy scroungers
plus free loaders
Hear, hear. not worth a pinch of poop. None of them.
Beautiful !! It's interesting to see them, and learn the history of the jewels. It is also interesting to hear the envy, and jealousy connected with these baubles !! LOL !! I have never seen or understood all the hoopla about stones and such !! I've seen paste that is quite pretty.. I don't get the value of some of the stones, it seems that we have unlimited diamonds !! I just don't get it !!!
Martie Gallego I love jewelry with precious stones....and had worked hard to buy some 30 pieces of very lovely and impressive fine jewelry over 40 years. Unfortunately, my home was burglarized twice and all but five pieces were stolen. Learning about precious stones, is equally enjoyable as wearing them. The stunning, beautiful shining jewels, do not come out of the ground like that. Precious stones in their rough origins are dull, brittle and very unimpressve. But once the highly skilled artisans, technicians, designers and gifted cutters work their magic on these stones....they are like beautiful butterflys emerging from the cocoon. I could and never would steal or kill for beautiful jewels;. But I totally get why others have done it down through history! Holding in your hand, and looking deep into the Magnificent hue of a 30 plus carat emerald ring, is most, most impressive and mesmerizing!!! You really cannot describe it! Something inside you immediately wants to possess it!
and in Africa, so many starving children die
It's no surprise how Queen Mary hoovered up the exiled Russian royals jewels at knock down prices, she was a well known kleptomaniac. Whenever those in her circle became aware the Queen was to visit they'd hide away as much of their valuables as possible because if Queen Mary spotted something she fancied she'd make it very clear how she admired such and such a piece and invariably she acquired the piece. On one occasion she actually managed to get her hands on an antique dining table and 12 chairs!
+Sherry Caraway Er no, Queen Mary was a klepto. She would simply say, "Oh what a beautiful piece, it would look wonderful at Sandringham" and that was it, the hostess would be expected to give it to her irrespective of provenance. During the war she used to steal farm equipment, "for the war effort" and her staff would have to quietly return it.
Also Queen Mary had an encyclopedia memory of all royal furniture, knick-knacks, lamps bookend and everything else. Some of those collections were broken up by previous Kings and given to friends as gifts. Queen Mary would visit those homes as guests of the nobility. She would inevitably she would see a chair, picture, book end or what ever and realized it was part of the royal collection and confiscate it to be put back in the original collection. This is how she got the description of being a kleptomaniac. So yes, those people would hide things when she came for a visit. She might have even noticed at one her palaces a portraits of a previous King sitting in a certain chair and would immediately recognize the real chair in a nobleman's house and confiscate it.
The spelling of some of these comments reveals just how poor we are, as a people!
Hear hear :)
+Jennifer Miller Respectfully, you're making a common mistake. It's not the "spelling" which is doing the revealing. It's the spelling in the "COMMENTS" which is doing the revealing. For instance, it's correct to say, "The look on their faces reveal a deep disappointment." The "look" in this case doesn't reveal, but "the look on their FACES" is what's doing the revealing. The original comment by Carol Brewbaker should read: "The spelling of some of these comments REVEAL just how poor we are, as a people!"
Jennifer Miller: Actually, Carol Brewbaker's grammar was correct the first time. There is absolutely no grammatical error in the phrase, "the spelling of some of these comments reveal just how poor we are, as a people." The term, "the spelling of some of these comments" is a compound possessive and therefore can, "reveal."
Carol Brewbaker not necessarily poor... very ignorant!
Actually that would be "The spelling of some of these comments REVEALS..... The spelling is doing the revealing... I mean, as long as we are correcting grammatical errors as well as spelling...
Can you imagine the great great grandmother of the Queen squandering all those jewels from the Russian royalty?!? Aghast!
That was her grandmother Mary her great great was queen Victoria
Fabulous gems, the Royal family are so lucky to have all this jewellery, the only thing is we don't often get to see them all. I would love to have a look through the Queens jewellery draw.
*Caroline SCHOLES* They are *NOT* the property of the Queen or the monarchy, they are owned by the state. They are totally separate from the Queen's personal jewelry which were bought and paid for privately.
I'm curious if the queen will have these same feelings since Meghan Markle is part of the royal family now..I am sure that Kate having been a member of the royal family for quiet some time now is loaned pieces more frequently than Diana was but I am curious if they will be so kind to Meghan.
Of course. The Meghan reportedly gets along really well with them.
Hrh-Pan F And especially since Meghan is now “the Star of the Show”, and brings in so much MONEY to them! 💎
@Maureen Ramsden - Meghan Dutchess of Sussex is a "working royal" so I think she will get to wear HM Queens jewellerys!!
@This Face Believes You - I think if they are "working royals" they will have da privilege of wearing HM Queens jewellerys!! BUT don't quote me on this as I'm not 100% sure!
Randall Stratton As the Queen is very fond of Meghan, I am certain she will have the choice of jewels 💎.
I really miss princess Diana
supernumery She ruined a number of lives too. Post divorce about a dozen of her loyal staff left, and could have taken her to an industrial tribunal for constructive dismissal. One did and received a payout. The rest didn't because Prince Charles paid them three times the amount that they would have been awarded by a tribunal. He didn't have to, but he did it to save her reputation. Not many people know that, and none of the so called Diana maniacs would want to know. The sad thing is that she could have done so much more good than she did, had she not been so obsessed with self publicity. There was one Christmas when, having had some negative press, she had her secretary ring Mother Teresa in Calcutta, and try to arrange a visit - which would have been great publicity. Instead, they suggested she visit their centre in London. That would not have made such great publicity, and the visit never happened. The legend of the great caring princess would only work if she had more publicity than anyone else.
+Hrh-Pan F Shut up idiot.
+M Scott Agreed, this sickening myth around her is bizarre. In reality she was a nasty piece of work from her starvation attempts to her throwing herself downstairs and then her persistent whoring around. She was *NO* saint, just a spoiled, spiteful woman.
*Suzannah Wade* Why? And she was *NEVER* Princess Diana, she was at various times, HRH The Princess Charles, The Princess of Wales and Diana, Princess of Wales. She was *NEVER* created a princess of the United Kingdom, her HRH came from her marriage to Charles and when that ended, she was given a courtesy title. Now, wake up from your, "My Little Pony" dreams and see reality, Diana was a petulant, spiteful woman who played the role of the, 'scorned woman' to perfection, the reality was totally different. *GROW UP*
+Gerald Cornwell - ouch!! wot a hard unsympathetic cold nut you are!... I bet no one in your fambily/friends seek you out when they need a shoulder to cry on!! Wow!
All stolen from India and other occupied countries.
To the victor goes the spoils - it has been so for thousands of years and perhaps they should have fought harder to keep them...
I wish they would do an updated version with new added history with the jewels .. like who wears them now ...
Gillian Foran Christmas market
give back our diamond!
Come and try to take it .
To whom ?
Sub jewellery mughlo say chori ki inho ny
YES ALMOST THANK YOU PUBLIC ILOVE YOU ROYALE FAMILY PERFECT DUCUMENT AMEN . ILOVE YOU DIANA AMEN 🕇🕇🕇⚘⚘⚘👸👑💖💖🌏🌐🌎👑👑👑⚘🌏
Amen indeed. Hope they don't survive too much longer. Then we won't have to read stupid emotional responses from these sycophants.
Rukiyati Kuebler LlLli
never have I seen such jewels... No words..!
They killed alot of ppl for them to get they're hands on them smh.... #blooddiamond
*YoubeinHack Hahaja* You are an idiot and blood diamonds are from the heads of state in vile African countries, *NOT* Britain.
The criminal house of Windsor and their stolen assets.
*Cosmic Carrot* Yapping idiot
That's what the House of Windsor needs, a new name.
Govt. of Transvaal???? In whose country? SMH
East India Company giving that jewelry to Queen Victoria sounds shady! But it is astonishing.
Dawn Baswell, and the US and UK continue to rape the world.... so, not sure how you figure nothing is owned to India at least from most obviously from racist and informant thieving UK.
Yes but now India rapes the govs of us Canada and uk with all there immigrants
Bass Trammel 9
Yeah. I said shady because it kinda looks like a bribe to me. Free pass to rape India and steal everything.
Bass Trammel As Interesting and fascinating, it still remains, that most of it was plundered from Th Indian People for The Coffers of The British, in The shape of The East India Company!!!
Allah wishing yes advance written to all lover earth all mankind if you sir madam novale Quran doctor.p.h.d I honor I saluate I adore plese say yes Allah wife choise I can walk with friend angale boyhood trusted companion angale gibraile Quran last prophets Quran yes I can walk
I don't believe how a person with such limited English could think of writing this diatribe. Write in your own tongue because the rest of us have no idea what you are ranting about. (Well, perhaps).
Lovely documentary....great history
Hi Janet, The Koh-i-Noor is on the Queen's Mother Crown; Or the Queen's Consort Crown, per se!! After Queen Victoria's death, the Koh-i-Noor was set in the Crown of Queen Alexandra, the wife of Edward VII, that was used to crown her at their coronation in 1902. The diamond was transferred to Queen Mary's Crown in 1911, and finally to The Queen Mother's Crown in 1937. When The Queen Mother died in 2002, it was placed on top of her coffin for the lying-in-state and funeral. In the Sceptre is the Cullinan I , or the Great Star of Africa, is a pendeloque-cut brilliant weighing 530.2 carats (106.04 g) and has 74 facets. Hope this was useful. x
Very enjoyable, but was The Koh-in -Noor diamond mentioned? Isn't it in The Sceptre? '
The anecdote of the guy having to go across town to get the pearls is truly the most snooty thing I've ever heard anyone say, ever. lol
Vor 7 years
Vor 6 years
Vor 3 Tage
Vor 6 Tage
Vor 4 Monate
Vor 8 Monate
Timeline - World History Documentaries
Vor 9 Monate
Vor 2 years
Vor 11 Monate
Live TV SHOWS
Vor 7 Monate
Vor 6 Monate
The Great British Channel
Vor 3 years
Vor 3 Monate
Vor 4 years
(UK) Mysterygirl00 History & Mysteries
Master Huon Damebrigge
Vor 8 Tage
Vor 2 Monate
Royal Television Society